Supreme court decision on gay marriage 2013 india

Supreme Court Same-Sex Marriage Verdict Explained Live: A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court that was headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, unanimously ruled against legalising same sex marriage in India today (October 17). The Court affirmed the Madras High Court decision in Arun Kumar v. Inspector General of Registration (), which declared marriage between a Hindu male and a transwoman a valid union.

Same-sex marriage in india

Sex between consenting homosexual partners is once again illegal in India after the country’s Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling Wednesday. Four years ago, India’s High.

In a historic decision, India's Supreme Court has ruled that gay sex is no longer a criminal offence. The ruling overturns a judgement that upheld a colonial-era law, known as section. Supreme Court ruled in a verdict against legalizing same-sex marriage in India. Petition: The court was hearing a bunch of petitions, asking for legalization of Same Sex Marriage in India, citing rights of LGBTQIA+ people.

Opinion of States: The court had sought responses from seven states on the issue of same sex marriage in India. Justice K. The LGBT mobilisation has also been formulated as part of a wider mobilisation for the right to love, whether it is same-sex love or love across castes and communities. Its chief architect was the Dalit lawyer and leader Dr Ambedkar, and it is supreme by his progressive views. A civil union refers to the legal status that allows same-sex couples specific rights and responsibilities normally conferred upon married couples.

KS Puttaswamy and Anr. They spell out their different routes to this conclusion in four concurring judgments. Insisting on a right to love can radically transform societies which are still divided based on caste, religion, class and other grounds. For a detailed history of the case, including legal documents, analysis, and media coverage, also visit However, the petitioners have called for an open hearing to review the judgement.

The petitioners argued that the provision violated their fundamental rights. The best marriage is perhaps the transformation of society that the judges ask for and the LGBT movement and its allies have worked for and must continue to work for in various ways. After introducing section in India, the British introduced similar legislation in other colonies. If india Court agrees to consider the petition, it does so in a closed circulation between the justices who were party to the original hearing.

What lies ahead? Login or Register to Post Comments. Union of India - Upheld the 2013 right gay privacy. The mobilisation against section in India has not been restricted to litigation and lawyers but has been broad and included artists, academia, activists, and media. Select Year Justice Chandrachud asks civil society to continue to address prejudices and realise full equality for LGBT persons. Minimum Marriageable Age For lesbian couples, the minimum age could be prescribed as 18 years, while for gay couples, it could be 21 years.

Positive Declaration. Decided 24 August Quick facts The Special Marriage Act, SMA It was enacted to facilitate the marriage of couples professing different faiths and preferring a civil wedding. The marriage has to be solemnised within 3 months of the notice. Ina petition was filed by the Naz Foundation, challenging the decision. The Supreme Court will now consider the review petitions in Supriyoand we must wait to see whether an open hearing is accepted and for the outcome of the review.

Majority vs.